Lessons in Cultural Storytelling: The Looking Glass, Banksy & Mr. Brainwash
What lessons can be learned by studying the pop art trickster foolery of Exit Through the Gift Shop?
What lessons can be learned by studying the pop art trickster foolery of Exit Through the Gift Shop?
We all need more heroes. Grant McCracken is one of mine. The leading business anthropologist of our time; a master ethnographer who specializes in American Pop Culture, brand advertising, and the intersection of commerce and culture. Two weekends ago, I had the pleasure of attending Grant’s one-day Culture Boot Camp in NYC, based on his book Chief Culture Officer. My review and reflections follow.
Mmmmmm…burger. What is about burgers that turns the ordinary grown man into a child or crackhead? Of course, its not just guys who lust over the perfect patty. Apologies to my vegetarian friends for even engaging in this discourse (I know, YUCK…) Still, I think there’s something deeply archetypal about burgers. It must be a caveman instinct.
There’s tons of lip service paid to culture these days, but few people really appreciate the intimate connections between culture, change, and storytelling. It goes to the heart of what many of us are really up to. “If you want to learn about a culture listen to the stories. If you want to change a culture, change the stories.” – [...]
As the dust settles from Oscar extravaganza, I can’t help but reflect on the Brand Story implications of big-time winning movie – Slumdog Millionaire and the country of India. In the case of Slumdog, which swept away 8 oscars, some say it represents the long due arrival of Bollywood and Indian culture into the west. Yet, this movie was directed [...]
That’s the million dollar question that has retailers of various stripes waiting with baited breath. I guess we’re all wondering whether this economic downturn is just the natural business cycle, or if instead a more fundamental shift is under way. Certainly, frugality is the word of the day – and just about everyone I know, including myself is cutting back [...]
I am increasingly asked to speak on Generation Y – the bumper crop of 18-28 year olds who are reshaping our cultural and consumption patterns. Numbering 68 million in the U.S., Generation Y is increasingly the most influential generation today, even above Baby Boomers (78 million) or Gen X (20 million). In Europe, Generation Y numbers 140 million strong! What [...]
In Another’s Shoes
Empathy is part of the larger ability humans have to put themselves in
another person’s shoes: we can attribute mental states—awareness,
intent—to another entity. Theory of mind, as this trait is known, is
crucial to social interaction and communal living—and to understanding
stories.
Children develop theory of mind around age four or five. A 2007
study by psychologists Daniela O’Neill and Rebecca Shultis, both at the
University of Waterloo in Ontario, found that five-year-olds could
follow the thoughts of an imaginary character but that three-year-olds
could not. The children saw model cows in both a barn and a field, and
the researchers told them that a farmer sitting in the barn was
thinking of milking the cow in the field. When then asked to point to
the cow the farmer wanted to milk, three-year-olds pointed to the cow
in the barn—they had a hard time following the character’s thoughts to
the cow in the field. Five-year-olds, however, pointed to the cow in
the field, demonstrating theory of mind.
Perhaps because theory of mind is so vital to social living, once we
possess it we tend to imagine minds everywhere, making stories out of
everything. A classic 1944 study by Fritz Heider and Mary-Ann Simmel,
then at Smith College, elegantly demonstrated this tendency. The
psychologists showed people an animation of a pair of triangles and a
circle moving around a square and asked the participants what was
happening. The subjects described the scene as if the shapes had
intentions and motivations—for example, “The circle is chasing the
triangles.” Many studies since then have confirmed the human
predilection to make characters and narratives out of whatever we see
in the world around us.
But what could be the evolutionary advantage of being so prone to
fantasy? “One might have expected natural selection to have weeded out
any inclination to engage in imaginary worlds rather than the real
one,” writes Steven Pinker, a Harvard University evolutionary
psychologist, in the April 2007 issue of Philosophy and Literature.
Pinker goes on to argue against this claim, positing that stories are
an important tool for learning and for developing relationships with
others in one’s social group. And most scientists are starting to
agree: stories have such a powerful and universal appeal that the
neurological roots of both telling tales and enjoying them are probably
tied to crucial parts of our social cognition.
As our ancestors evolved to live in groups, the hypothesis goes,
they had to make sense of increasingly complex social relationships.
Living in a community requires keeping tabs on who the group members
are and what they are doing. What better way to spread such information
than through storytelling?
Indeed, to this day people spend most of their conversations telling
personal stories and gossiping. A 1997 study by anthropologist and
evolutionary biologist Robin Dunbar, then at the University of
Liverpool in England, found that social topics accounted for 65 percent
of speaking time among people in public places, regardless of age or
gender.
Anthropologists note that storytelling could have also persisted in
human culture because it promotes social cohesion among groups and
serves as a valuable method to pass on knowledge to future generations.
But some psychologists are starting to believe that stories have an
important effect on individuals as well—the imaginary world may serve
as a proving ground for vital social skills.